• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Getting mbuf length
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Getting mbuf length


  • Subject: Re: Getting mbuf length
  • From: Mitchell Laurren-Ring <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 01:31:12 -0800

I guess I misunderstood the difference between "IP fragmentation" and "HTTP request is too big to fit into a single IP packet." If I have the latter case, shouldn't I just receive the rest of the HTTP request in a subsequent call to my bottleneck?


-Mick

On Nov 19, 2008, at 10:55 AM, Vincent Lubet wrote:

I think you will find there is no IP fragmentation but rather that the HTTP request is simply too big to fit is a single IP packet. Remember that the job of IP protocol is to packetize higher level protocol like UDP, TCP, HTTP, FTP and so on. An IP filter that wants to parse application level protocols like HTTP needs to be prepared to deal with all the protocol details of IP, TCP and HTTP.

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Macnetworkprog mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Getting mbuf length (From: Mitchell Laurren-Ring <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Getting mbuf length (From: Vincent Lubet <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Getting mbuf length (From: Mitchell Laurren-Ring <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Getting mbuf length (From: Vincent Lubet <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: SCPreferencesCreateWithAuthorization
  • Next by Date: Re: Getting mbuf length
  • Previous by thread: Re: Getting mbuf length
  • Next by thread: Re: Getting mbuf length
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread