• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: EO_PK_TABLE and auto_increment
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: EO_PK_TABLE and auto_increment


  • Subject: Re: EO_PK_TABLE and auto_increment
  • From: Arturo PĂ©rez <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 22:17:57 -0500

I think project wonder may have a plugin for MySQL. I know it does for Postgresql and Oracle. You may want to take those and modify them to work with the way that your legacy system works.

I think there was is a delegate in EOF that lets you generate primary keys how ever you would want to.
-arturo


On Nov 15, 2005, at 9:10 PM, Corin Lawson wrote:

Hi,

More questions here to build upon the one below...

Would Project Wonder offer a solution? If yes, how would one go about it or begin?

Can I import WOnder into Eclipse? If yes, do any guides/instructions exist and where?


Cheers, Corin.


On 08/11/2005, at 5:00 PM, Corin Lawson wrote:


Mysql... (sorry I forgot to mention.)

On 01/11/2005, at 11:11 PM, Ken Anderson wrote:

What database are you using?

On Nov 1, 2005, at 3:53 AM, Corin Lawson wrote:



On 01/11/2005, at 7:39 PM, Corin Lawson wrote:


Hi all,

I have a WO app that accesses an existing database which is currently used by a larger system.

My requirement is to integrate these systems that share the one database. This means that WO does not have exclusive control of generating primary keys. Furthermore the older system relies on auto_increment to create keys.

The only workaround that I can think of is to set the values in EO_PK_TABLE to some ridiculously large number (but not to large, perhaps somewhere in between the current value and the upper limit). Does anyone have another idea? Can WO default behaviour be changed to accept the use of auto_increment?

Thanks,

Corin.


But that won't work either coz auto_increment uses that last added pk.

Pls help...

Corin.

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
email@hidden


This email sent to email@hidden






_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
email@hidden


This email sent to email@hidden


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: EO_PK_TABLE and auto_increment
      • From: Corin Lawson <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: EO_PK_TABLE and auto_increment (From: Corin Lawson <email@hidden>)
 >Re: EO_PK_TABLE and auto_increment (From: Corin Lawson <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: 5.3.1: license confusion!
  • Next by Date: Re: Sun Application server JDBC
  • Previous by thread: Re: EO_PK_TABLE and auto_increment
  • Next by thread: Re: EO_PK_TABLE and auto_increment
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread