• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: [Newbie] Lincensing of WO apps
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Newbie] Lincensing of WO apps


  • Subject: Re: [Newbie] Lincensing of WO apps
  • From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 15:19:24 +0000


On Nov 27, 2005, at 2:57 PM, Miguel Arroz wrote:

(1) over a network, components of the WebObjects deployment software for installation and use by others (“Java Client End Users”) on any remote computer’s volatile memory (e.g. RAM) to enable Java Client functionality for the sole purpose of communicating with Apple’s WebObjects Software that may be installed and executed on the same Apple-labeled computer on which you have installed the Developer Software (the "Licensed System"); and (2) both manually and automatically over a network, components of the WebObjects deployment software for installation and use by Java Client End Users on any remote computer’s non-volatile memory (e.g. ROM) to enable Java Client functionality for the sole purpose of communicating with Apple’s WebObjects Software that may be installed and executed on the Licensed System; provided that all distributions to Java Client End Users are made under terms that are at least as restrictive as those set forth in this License and contain the disclaimers and limitations set forth in Sections 6 and 7 of this License.

This paragraph is referring specifically to the Java Client software. This is not (as far as I can tell) the actual Server components. It repeatedly specifies "Java Client End Users". Java Clients actually contain portions of the Web Objects Deployment code so I feel that is why they mention the deployment tools.


The reason that this may be confusing the issue is that this is not the normal way in which most WO applications are deployed. This is not for a web application. It is for a client-server application where the client application is NOT a web browser, but an actual Java application that is distributed either as an compiled executable or through Java WebStart and the deployment code that is contained in this client application can only be used to communicate back to a licensed application server. The application server itself still requires a valid deployment key, which is only available through purchase of OS X Server 10.4.

I hope I am incorrect in this interpretation. It would be wonderful if we had the ability to deploy for free. But I just don't read it that way.

Please! Prove me wrong!

Dave _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: [Newbie] Lincensing of WO apps
      • From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>
References: 
 >[Newbie] Lincensing of WO apps (From: Stefan Pantke <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [Newbie] Lincensing of WO apps (From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [Newbie] Lincensing of WO apps (From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: [Newbie] Lincensing of WO apps
  • Next by Date: Re: [Newbie] Lincensing of WO apps
  • Previous by thread: Re: [Newbie] Lincensing of WO apps
  • Next by thread: Re: [Newbie] Lincensing of WO apps
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread