Re: WebObjects Licensing
Re: WebObjects Licensing
- Subject: Re: WebObjects Licensing
- From: "Joe Little" <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:43:58 -0700
This is how we have deployed some of our instances onto Linux. The one
trick is to change the executable to use "darwin" instead of "`uname
-a`" to detect what system it is, and to maintain the /Library and
/System paths it expects to find.
I'm deploying on both OSX Server and on Linux (the latter for a group
w/ a no Mac but pro Java policy, go figure)
On 5/15/06, Randy Wigginton <email@hidden> wrote:
This is the method I am about to attempt... copying the libraries from my
mac system to a linux box. The licensing situation (and the voluminous
discussions here) seem to say that it is OK to do this.
Has anyone else done this?
On 2/6/06, Cliff Tuel <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> Is the expectation from Apple that the process we would follow (should
we
> want to "wotaskd deploy" on non MacOS-X boxes) is to pick the pieces out
from
> there and copy them onto the foreign deployment host?
We don't ship a non-OS X installer, so there's no other way. Maybe a
third-party opportunity?
--
Cliff Tuel . http://apple.com/services/technicalsupport
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden )
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden