Re: Java Packages for Dummies
Re: Java Packages for Dummies
- Subject: Re: Java Packages for Dummies
- From: Anjo Krank <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 15:03:12 +0100
Am 05.12.2007 um 14:44 schrieb Mike Schrag:
It turns out to be almost never the case that you want to fetch all
"Open Tasks". It tends to be the case for us that you almost always
want to have additional qualifiers on those searches, which ends up
that you fault a HUGE (many thousands) of EO's in just to turn back
around and filter them down in memory. Instead, I can remove that
relationship completely and provide just the variant of the to-many
that takes a qualifier.
Of course not and I agree 100%. But the example was user <-
>>transactions which *I* would not fetch manually unless I had
problems with multiple instances.
And the case above would normally be in an SEC which would have no
outgoing relations anyway.
But I do recall you fixing that NSArray bug, now, and I actually
haven't timed this out ... Might be interesting to see a graph of
fault speed as that array size grows on a "normal" sized EO.
From what I remember not really much. Something like 600ms for 20k
objects if memory serves.
Cheers, Anjo
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden