Re: JSF
Re: JSF
- Subject: Re: JSF
- From: Andrus Adamchik <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:49:12 +0200
Yeah... JSF is a mess. So is the underlying JSP. Tapestry can't keep
compatibility with itself for more than a year in a row, and hence
can't be used for enterprise applications that have a much longer
maintenance lifespan. And now with web development going all
JavaScript, the talent pool for potential open source WO challengers
is quickly draining. So WO is doing quite well by comparison and
might just keep claiming the best HTML component framework position
for years to come. Go figure :-)
Andrus
On Dec 20, 2007, at 8:29 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
http://www.jsftutorials.net/components/pic/relationship.jpg
I think this sums up JSF quite nicely :)
ms
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: JSF
- From: "Tonny Staunsbrink" <email@hidden>
| References: | |
| | >JSF (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>) |