Re: JS libraries used with WO
Re: JS libraries used with WO
- Subject: Re: JS libraries used with WO
- From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 07:38:42 -0400
As long as you are not returning HTML that contains component
actions, I think this will be enough (meaning if you're just fire-and-
forget to an action in the background). If you are returning HTML
results with component actions in them and replacing page contents
with it, you will need to behave like an AjaxUpdateContainer and also
add AjaxUtils.setPageReplacementCacheKey(context, id); where "id" is
a unique identifier for the updating area on the page. This causes
the ajax-specific cache to turn on which will allow component actions
to function. But really, you're making your life hard ... Just use
AjaxUpdateContainer and AjaxSubmitButton if you get to that point.
They do the work so you don't have to.
ms
On Jun 21, 2007, at 5:28 AM, Paul Stringer wrote:
Got it, I was already using ERXSession but I looked again at what I
was doing and discovered I was indeed being naive and care free
with use of a plain old new WOResponse() with my HTML in. I
modified this to an AjaxUtils.createResponse() hopefully I think
means people could submit the form to their hearts content without
ever seeing the backtrack page.
Paul S
On Jun 20, 2007, at 9:10 PM, email@hidden
wrote:
Keep in mind that your backtrack cache WILL get blown out if you're
not using something like the code in ERXAjaxSession from Ajax
framework. It will tease you by appearing to work fine, but it's
only a tease.
ms
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40mdimension.com
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden