Re: Please Opensource WebObjects
Re: Please Opensource WebObjects
- Subject: Re: Please Opensource WebObjects
- From: Ian Joyner <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 11:55:02 +1000
Did I miss something? Is .net open source?
As for Stephane's comment "and IBM is everywhere with WebSphere,
there's a lot of lobbying inside to kill WO"
that has always been the case with IBM and now Microsoft lobbyists -
the problem is that those technologies need a lot more people to make
them fly, so they have a louder voice in any company. If you remove
the open source argument, they'll just move on to the next thing they
see as a convincing argument for pointy-haired management.
On 04/10/2007, at 5:48 AM, Alex Cone wrote:
Read Apple's Lips: Not Going To Happen. Period. If that means we
have to lose you to .NET, then get going and stop posting.
This topic has been discussed to death. There are some good
reasons why it isn't going to happen and your posting the 10,000th
post about it isn't going to change that.
Please, everyone, let's get back to WebObjects ==>DEV<== topics.
Alex
The original British monentary system:
Two farthings=One Ha'penny. Two ha'pennies=One Penny. Three
pennies=A Thrupenny Bit. Two thrupences=A Sixpence. Two
sixpences=One Shilling, or Bob. Two bob=A Florin. One florin and
a sixpence=Half a Crown. Four half crowns=Ten Bob Note. Two ten
bob notes=One Pound (or 240 pennies). One pound and one
shilling=One Guinea.
The British resisted decimalized currency for a long time
because they thought it was too complicated.
And which country now resists metric weights and measurements? I just
cannay fathom it! ;-)
Ian
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden