Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?
Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?
- Subject: Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?
- From: Simon McLean <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 10:37:42 +0100
We have been eclipse based for 9 months now, but old habits die hard:
I still use WOBuilder for 90% of my component building. i just find
it so much faster to quickly flesh out a component and bind it up.
It's probably because we still live and breath tables - i'm sure if
we moved to pure CSS based components we'd find WOCE is streets ahead
of WOB.
Simon
On 4 Sep 2007, at 09:55, Andrew Lindesay wrote:
Hello;
I have some words to eat; I have to say that after some months
working with the "woproject component-editor" in Eclipse, I'm not
missing the graphical builder.
cheers.
___
Andrew Lindesay
technology : www.lindesay.co.nz
business : www.silvereye.co.nz
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40mac.com
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden