• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: gcc 3.3 and universal format ?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gcc 3.3 and universal format ?


  • Subject: Re: gcc 3.3 and universal format ?
  • From: Chris Espinosa <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 22:57:16 -0700

On Jun 6, 2005, at 9:48 PM, Andrew Kimpton wrote:

I'm pretty sure the answer to this is 'No' but can you use gcc 3.3 to produce a universal format binary with XCode 2.1 ?


The answer, as you guessed, is no.  gcc 3.3 only builds ppc binaries.

We might need to continue support 10.3 customers who've not upgraded to 10.3.9 so we need to use gcc 3.3


For 10.3 we recommend that you just build with gcc 4.0 and advise your users to update to 10.3.9.  It's free, it's more stable, it's more secure.

If your customers are still on 10.2.8, though, it's a different story.  You can build your ppc side with gcc 3.3 and your Intel side with gcc 4.0.  It's a little tricky, but it is possible.  At this point you have to build them as separate targets and lipo them together in a shell script build phase.  If demand is high we may improve this in the future.

Chris

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: gcc 3.3 and universal format ?
      • From: Mark Dawson <email@hidden>
    • Re: gcc 3.3 and universal format ?
      • From: Andrew Kimpton <email@hidden>
References: 
 >gcc 3.3 and universal format ? (From: Andrew Kimpton <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Enabling Intel compilation?
  • Next by Date: Re: SCM status is gone/XC2.1
  • Previous by thread: gcc 3.3 and universal format ?
  • Next by thread: Re: gcc 3.3 and universal format ?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread