Re: Const correctness and fun
Re: Const correctness and fun
- Subject: Re: Const correctness and fun
- From: Andreas Grosam <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:52:22 +0200
On 13.06.2005, at 19:10, Cameron Hayne wrote:
On 13-Jun-05, at 12:30 PM, David Fang wrote:
I used to be confused about it a long time ago. Someone
summarized in an earlier post: "const" modifies the thing to the
left. If
there's nothing to the left, then it applies to the right.
I think it is easier to just always read declarations from right to
left (* is read as "pointer to"):
const char* cs
cs is a pointer to a const char
char* const cs
cs is a const pointer to char
well, since we are here ;-)
a riddle, what is this:
typedef char const * (ns::X:: * const MF) (const char * const *) const;
--
Cameron Hayne
email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
email@hidden
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden