Re: ZeroLink fails
Re: ZeroLink fails
- Subject: Re: ZeroLink fails
- From: Scott Tooker <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:47:11 -0700
Yeah, we were internally discussing that documentation. The problem
prior to gcc 4.0 was that the standard C++ library was always
statically linked in, so ZeroLink was needed if you wanted to use C++
code with fix & continue. Now with gcc 4.0, the standard libstdc++ is
a dynamic library, so Fix & Continue should work without the need for
ZeroLink, but we haven't extensively tested this yet.
Scott
On Jun 22, 2005, at 11:19 AM, Rich Siegel wrote:
On 6/22/05 at 10:35 AM, Scott Tooker <email@hidden> wrote:
No, ZeroLink and Fix & Continue are orthogonal features.
According to the Xcode documentation, you will need to use ZeroLink if
you're writing in C++:
<http://developer.apple.com/documentation/DeveloperTools/Conceptual/
XcodeUserGuide21/Contents/Resources/en.lproj/
06_06_db_fix_and_continue/
chapter_44_section_4.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40001871-CH244-
CACJBFDG>
I can't speak to the correctness of that, because at the moment
I've got
ZeroLink working, but "Fix & Continue" just beeps. :-)
R.
--
Rich Siegel Bare Bones Software, Inc.
<email@hidden> <http://
www.barebones.com/>
Someday I'll look back on all this and laugh... until they sedate me.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden