• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Using XCode and en.lproj vs. English.lproj
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Using XCode and en.lproj vs. English.lproj


  • Subject: Using XCode and en.lproj vs. English.lproj
  • From: João Varela <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:57:48 +0100

Hello people

I recently joined this list because I am moving all my projects from CW to xcode. At first I was a little bit daunted by the task at hand but in the last few days I managed to move two projects to xcode which now compile and work properly. This is really great. I have three more to go but the last results are certainly encouraging.

I must say that have tried many times to start using XCode / Project Builder but before XCode 2.x I would always come back to CW as I could not stand how slow gcc was. XCode has come a long way and I can say I am really enjoying XCode 2.1. This would be unthinkable a year ago. Still, XCode needs improvement especially in compilation speed and the quality of dead code stripping. The CW linker is still far superior in this regard. I do hope you guys can make it better and surpass CW compilers and linkers.

Also another weird thing I noticed is that when I create a common source folder for shared source files among several projects (and so they sit outside the current project folder hierarchy) their code size does not appear in the project window after compilation; only the files that are present in the same directory as the project file have their code sizes upon compilation. Is this a bug or is this intentional? (If it is a bug I can file one).

I am going to file a request bug to improve the syntax coloring of XCode, so that APIs, methods, classes, etc, get their own syntax coloring as well like in CW. Actually, everything that is defined earlier and you can "jump to definition" should have its syntax color, like in CW. That would be just great.

Finally, I have a couple of questions. I was reading the documentation about how a modern bundle should look like, especially that in regard to localization resources. Also Deborah Goldsmith has urged us to stop using English.lproj or French.lproj as the directories to put our localized resources and use en.lproj and fr.lproj instead. However, XCode project stationery still uses the old locale names and creates an English.lproj directory instead of creating directories with the proper ISO regional designators. Thus, I have few questions:

1) Is this a known bug? If not I am happy to file one;

2) If this is not a bug, how can I configure XCode to create the localized resource directories with the proper ISO regional designators? (if this is not possible I can also file a bug)

3) If I start using the new locale designators, will this break my bundle in earlier versions of Mac OS X such as Jaguar and Panther?

TIA

Joao Varela
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Using XCode and en.lproj vs. English.lproj
      • From: Frédéric BLANC <email@hidden>
    • Re: Using XCode and en.lproj vs. English.lproj
      • From: Scott Tooker <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: Disabling "You are about to undo past the last point this file was saved" sheet?
  • Next by Date: breakpoints & line-endings
  • Previous by thread: Re: Disabling "You are about to undo past the last point this file was saved" sheet?
  • Next by thread: Re: Using XCode and en.lproj vs. English.lproj
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread