• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Building fat Darwin gcc
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Building fat Darwin gcc


  • Subject: Re: Building fat Darwin gcc
  • From: Bill Northcott <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 06:15:02 +1100

On 13/11/2005, at 8:55 AM, Markus Hitter wrote:

The MacOSX10.4u.sdk contains a complete set of fat libraries. Is it possible to use these ...

Maybe, yes. My knowledge base ( ;-) ) gives me this snippet to build for older Mac OS Xs on Tiger:


export MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.2
CFLAGS='-O2 -isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.2.8.sdk' \
LDFLAGS='-Wl,-syslibroot,/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.2.8.sdk' \
./configure --disable-nls --prefix=/usr/global

Hope that's helpful for future Mac OS Xs as well. Leech into Xcode's build transscript when building a Universal app to find out further details.

Thanks. That was the clue I wanted. I will give it a try and fall back to the full Darwin build if it fails.


Bill
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Building fat Darwin gcc (From: Bill Northcott <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Building fat Darwin gcc (From: Markus Hitter <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Building fat Darwin gcc (From: Shawn Erickson <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Building fat Darwin gcc (From: Bill Northcott <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Building fat Darwin gcc (From: Markus Hitter <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Serious problem with XCode 2.2 treating unsigned long differently ?!
  • Next by Date: Re: Serious problem with XCode 2.2 treating unsigned long differently ?!
  • Previous by thread: Re: Building fat Darwin gcc
  • Next by thread: Re: Building fat Darwin gcc
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread