Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: otest -- only useful for bundles?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: otest -- only useful for bundles?

Subject: Re: otest -- only useful for bundles?
From: Chris Hanson <email@hidden>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:16:38 -0800

On Nov 22, 2005, at 8:41 AM, James Bucanek wrote:

So the only time a program of any kind needs to contain custom code to support unit testing is in the case of a C/C++ tool where there is no convienient way for a static initializer in the unit test bundle to intercept its normal execution?


Yes, exactly.

  -- Chris

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden



References:  
  >Re: otest -- only useful for bundles? (From: James Bucanek <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: otest -- only useful for bundles?

Next by Date:
Changing automatic header insert

Previous by thread:
Re: otest -- only useful for bundles?

Next by thread:
Re: otest -- only useful for bundles?

Index(es):

Date
Thread