Re: How packages are recognized...
Re: How packages are recognized...
- Subject: Re: How packages are recognized...
- From: Andrew Merenbach <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 07:47:09 -0700
I know that the OP asked, so Alastair was simply answering him, but,
from a philosophical point of view...
Does it actually make any sense to set the bundle bit of a bundle
when you could simply use a UTI declaration? Bundles that aren't of
the default type (.kext, .plugin, .bundle, .app) don't tend to exist
on their own, do they? rather, they have an application to which
they're attached. Thus might the UTI declaration be a little more
effective?
Cheers,
Andrew
On Aug 7, 2007, at 7:38 AM, Alastair Houghton wrote:
On 7 Aug 2007, at 15:17, Eric Gorr wrote:
For 'The directory has its bundle bit set'...it seems I should
know what this is referring to, but my mind is drawing a blank.
How would one set the bundle bit of a folder to turn it into a
package?
/Developer/Tools/SetFile -a B MyFolder
(Type "man SetFile" in Terminal to see the docs for SetFile.)
Kind regards,
Alastair.
--
http://alastairs-place.net
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40ucla.edu
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden