Re: Cross OS version UB development
Re: Cross OS version UB development
- Subject: Re: Cross OS version UB development
- From: "Alexander v. Below" <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 18:19:43 +0100
Am 24.02.2007 um 17:31 schrieb John Daniel:
It is not worth it to support 10.1 or 10.0
I agree 100%, unless you have some very, very, extremely worthwhile reason to do so.
Am 24.02.2007 um 18:14 schrieb Shawn Erickson: It is probably safer to create two targets in your project, one for Intel only (using 10.4) and one for PPC (10.2) and meld them together using lipo in a 3rd target that has only a run script build phase.
Why? Xcode supports building a UB directly for you (by default Release configuration does this while Debug only build the platform you are running on). You don't need to make it harder on yourself. This capability works fine so I suggest you use it.
Because I'm not an Xcode wizard.
You don't have to be.
Right. And you have to be a terminal wizard to set up script phase that lipos your binaries. This was necessary in Xcode 2.1, but those days, luckily, are long gone.
The list archive for this list is full of fool proof instructions how to set it up, too ;)
Alex |
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden