Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: staticly linked libc ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: staticly linked libc ?

Subject: Re: staticly linked libc ?
From: Jonas Maebe <email@hidden>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:45:01 +0100


On 26 Feb 2007, at 21:40, Dave Dyer wrote:

I'm thinking that a plausible way to address this problem is to
staticly link libc
My question is, how do I direct xcode to do this?

Statically linking to libc is unsupported on Mac OS X (Mac OS X even doesn't ship with a statically linkable libc), because

a) libc is tied to system calls b) system calls are a private interface, i.e. they can appear, disappear and change behaviour at any time

So a particular version of libc is completely tied to the OS version it shipped with.


Jonas
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden



References:  
  >Re: staticly linked libc ? (From: Dave Dyer <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: staticly linked libc ?

Next by Date:
Re: mulithreading, dual-core

Previous by thread:
Re: staticly linked libc ?

Next by thread:
Re: staticly linked libc ?

Index(es):

Date
Thread