• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3


  • Subject: Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3
  • From: Doug Hill <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:38:02 -0700


On Apr 15, 2008, at 11:07 AM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:

On Tuesday, April 15, 2008, at 10:40AM, "Steve Checkoway" <email@hidden> wrote:

On Apr 15, 2008, at 10:12 AM, Joachim Deelen wrote:

As I said in my previous post. Increasing RAM (at least more than
1GB) and a clean install of Leopard helped a lot.
My PowerBook G4 1.5 GHz and 1.5 GB RAM works good with Xcode 3. An
the Projects I'm working on are not small at all.

This wasn't my experience. I bought a gig of ram for my PB 1.33 GHz (I
think I had to remove 256 MB to put that stick in) and Xcode is still
almost totally unusable.

My experience matches Steve's. My 1.33 PB has a gig of RAM and a clean install of Leopard, and Xcode's editor is unusable on that system with moderately large Obj-C files (2-3 thousand lines). I filed a bug report on that back in October rdar://problem/5572897 with a completely reproducible test case and Shark traces (Instruments is even worse than Xcode on a single core system). Six months without a bugfix release of the dev tools is a bummer, too.

My experience is with running Xcode 2.x on a 450MHz G4 tower with 10.4.x installed. With 1 GB of RAM Xcode is so slow as to be completely unusable. Doing a little bit of poking around in System Profiler tells me the slowdown comes from massive amounts of paging to disk when the GCC tools are running. I then upgraded to 2GB of RAM and things are back to be acceptable. Looking in System Profiler again, I notice that GCC will use ~2GB of RAM for non-trivial compiles.


I'm not going to recommend this configuration but I suggest you start adding RAM until GCC stops paging to disk. It might take more than 2GB. Also, try out Xcode 2.5 instead of 3.0 and see if that helps your performance.

Doug Hill
Oracle Corp.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3
      • From: P Teeson <email@hidden>
References: 
 >G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3 (From: P Teeson <email@hidden>)
 >Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3 (From: Thomas Engelmeier <email@hidden>)
 >Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3 (From: William Bates <email@hidden>)
 >Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3 (From: "Wesley Smith" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3 (From: "Adam R. Maxwell" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3 (From: Joachim Deelen <email@hidden>)
 >Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3 (From: Steve Checkoway <email@hidden>)
 >Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3 (From: "Adam R. Maxwell" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: how to link with readline library in an xcode project?
  • Next by Date: Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3
  • Previous by thread: Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3
  • Next by thread: Re: G4 867mhz, Leopard, and XCode 3
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread