Re: Interface Builder popularity w/ Cocoa Developers
Re: Interface Builder popularity w/ Cocoa Developers
- Subject: Re: Interface Builder popularity w/ Cocoa Developers
- From: Alex Curylo <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:03:06 -0700
On 16-Jun-08, at 12:08 PM, email@hidden wrote:
Either that or there *are* reasons and they don't want to acknowledge
them publicly. ;-) Otherwise, why not at least explain these
limitations?
Well, I'd guess that the parts like "you agree not to ... decompile,
reverse engineer, disassemble, attempt to derive the source code of,
modify, decrypt, or create derivative works of" is what they want to
make sure everybody getting their hands on it has legally agreed to,
and it's not as important to them that nice developers can be more
productive than it is that bad developers have any chance to get away
with any of the bad things listed by being able to justify that they
legally gleaned necessary information from the not-bad people's
discussions.
Most of us probably think that's unreasonably paranoid, but that's why
we're not lawyers, isn't it?
--
Alex Curylo -- email@hidden -- http://www.alexcurylo.com/
Altitude, airspeed, a brain: You need at least two.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden