Re: Static-linking a framework?
Re: Static-linking a framework?
- Subject: Re: Static-linking a framework?
- From: Kai <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 22:24:02 +0100
No, unfortunately I do not know how to achieve your goal. I just want
to second you that this is a very desirable feature. I would
appreciate it if you could keep me updated in case you find a solution.
Best
Kai
On 4.3.2008, at 00:08, Uli Kusterer wrote:
Hi,
hope this is on-topic for this list, if not, I'd appreciate pointers
to the right list:
I like the way frameworks group code and related resources, package
them up for distribution, and enforce encapsulation by making it
clear where the framework ends and the client application begins.
However, I don't want to have an application that consists of
millions of frameworks, and I'd probably pay quite an overhead if
the dynamic linker had to load all these frameworks.
So I'm wondering if there's a way to statically link a framework
into an application?
At worst, I could probably create a static library target for each
module, but then I'd have to manually add all the resources, so I
was kinda hoping there was a way to abuse frameworks for this?
Cheers,
-- Uli Kusterer
"The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere..."
http://www.zathras.de
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden