Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Is or Is Not XCode 3.1 supposed to replace 3.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Is or Is Not XCode 3.1 supposed to replace 3.0

Subject: Is or Is Not XCode 3.1 supposed to replace 3.0
From: William Squires <email@hidden>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:03:45 -0500

Just a simple yes/no question here, so hopefully doesn't violate NDA on iPhone stuff. I installed the "new" XCode 3.1 (yes, from the iPhone dev URL), and the readme ("About iPhone SDK.pdf") states that one should create a new folder, or it'll overwrite XCode 3.0 if installed in /Developer. But none of the sample projects compile as it can't find the headers (like, maybe, the paths are supposed to point to / Developer/???) from within the precompiled header in the sample projects. So is it, "yes, XCode 3.1 is separate from XCode 3.0" (in which case the installer has a snafu), or "no, you're supposed to use the package to UPDATE 3.0 -> 3.1"?

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


Follow-Ups:

Re: Is or Is Not XCode 3.1 supposed to replace 3.0
From: Chris Espinosa <email@hidden>
Re: Is or Is Not XCode 3.1 supposed to replace 3.0
From: Bill Bumgarner <email@hidden>


Prev by Date:
Re: Interface Builder: Metal Window

Next by Date:
Re: Is or Is Not XCode 3.1 supposed to replace 3.0

Previous by thread:
Re: Interface Builder Controller. Beginner question

Next by thread:
Re: Is or Is Not XCode 3.1 supposed to replace 3.0

Index(es):

Date
Thread