Re: Added Framework has a Configuration (Release/Debug) ?
Re: Added Framework has a Configuration (Release/Debug) ?
- Subject: Re: Added Framework has a Configuration (Release/Debug) ?
- From: "Sean McBride" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:18:40 -0400
- Organization: Rogue Research Inc.
On 8/19/09 4:26 PM, Jerry Krinock said:
>After studying Ken's explanation, it turns out that I DON'T EVEN NEED
>those stupid private framework products in my "Linked Frameworks"
>Group. Instead, products from the "Referenced Projects" can have
>their Target Membership activated to link them, and be dragged into
>the "Copy Frameworks" Build Phase to get them copied into the
>product. I then removed them, did the double-clean and double-build
>as described in my original post, got no errors this time, and the app
>works.
>
>So, to summarize, here's the Configuration-Agnostic Way to add private
>frameworks:
>
>1. Make sure you've added the project which produces the private
>framework to your project. Suggested location: Make a "Referenced
>Projects" group. You need to do this to set a dependency anyhow.
And if the framework has no corresponding Xcode project (say it was
built with autotools or CMake), is there a nice way to have different
versions per configuration? (That's my situation.)
--
____________________________________________________________
Sean McBride, B. Eng email@hidden
Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com
Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden