Re: Xcode 3.2 libtool, ld64
Re: Xcode 3.2 libtool, ld64
- Subject: Re: Xcode 3.2 libtool, ld64
- From: Peter O'Gorman <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 12:41:03 -0500
Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> b) what is the best backwards and forward compatible way (in terms of
> "the command line can remain identical") to link dylibs? gcc nowadays
> calls "collect2". Is there a reason why we should not call ld directly?
> I called libtool because I thought that it might (one day) do some extra
> things behind the scenes, and didn't want us to risk suddenly breaking
> at that point. Obviously, that did not work out so well.
>
Hi,
I know that it's ugly, but, in my opinion, the most compatible way to do
this is for your compiler to call Apple's compiler for the link step,
not ld or libtool (I believe this is what icc does).
Peter
--
Peter O'Gorman
http://pogma.com
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden