Re: Ordinal Numbers (1st, 2nd, etc.)
Re: Ordinal Numbers (1st, 2nd, etc.)
- Subject: Re: Ordinal Numbers (1st, 2nd, etc.)
- From: Michelle Steiner <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 23:37:54 -0700
On 8/16/01 5:34 PM, Bill Briggs <email@hidden> wrote:
>
Close, but it breaks down at 111, 112, 113, 211, 212, 213, 311, 312,
>
313, etc. You'll have to build in a check for the "teens" in every
>
"century".
Whoops; my script has the same error.
--Michelle
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Michelle Steiner | We're not human beings having a spiritual |
| | experience. We're spiritual beings |
| email@hidden | having a human experience. |
----------------------------------------------------------------------