Re: Ordinal Numbers (1st, 2nd, etc.)
Re: Ordinal Numbers (1st, 2nd, etc.)
- Subject: Re: Ordinal Numbers (1st, 2nd, etc.)
- From: Bill Briggs <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 14:02:13 -0300
At 12:03 PM -0400 18/08/01, Arthur J Knapp wrote:
(My excuse? Well, you see, on my planet, 101 would be "One Hundred
and Oneth"... )
Really?!?!?! What planet are you writing from? In the higher
latitudes of the Americas it's "One Hundred and First" (which will
soon be the ordinal for some post in this thread). Does this mean we
need both Oxford and Webster versions of the handler? Or a dialog in
which to make the choice, eh? :-)
- web