• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: My m*d is bigger than yours
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: My m*d is bigger than yours


  • Subject: Re: My m*d is bigger than yours
  • From: Arthur J Knapp <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 18:09:26 -0500

> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 23:35:58 +0100
> From: "Serge Belleudy-d'Espinose" <email@hidden>
> Subject: My m*d is bigger than yours

> At 16:37 +0000 12/12/01, has wrote:

I know this was a sort-of private conversation, but...

>> Equally, Arthur could have placed the code directly within the
>> constructor's own "script Associative...end script" and then you'd have had
>> only one top-level object, "MakeAssociative(param)", in the entire script.
>> But I think separating the two and using the parent property keeps the code
>> neater this way (else the constructor handler would very long and ugly to
>> read, and so harder to code).

At the time, I actually thought it was more memory effecient to have a
script constructor arranged this way. Now, I'm not so sure. (Maybe Scott
Norton has some thoughts on this).


P.S. You haven't seen my m*d...


{ Arthur J. Knapp, of <http://www.STELLARViSIONs.com>
<mailto:email@hidden>
try
<http://mtlab.ecn.fpu.ac.jp/scripting/Jcode_osax.html>
on error number -128
end try
}


  • Prev by Date: Re: ScriptingIllustrator9.x and InDesign 1.5 or 2
  • Next by Date: Re: applescript-users digest, Vol 2 #1399 - 16 msgs
  • Previous by thread: My m*d is bigger than yours
  • Next by thread: Sorry, please delete my stuff
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread