• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Attachable vs. Embeddable
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Attachable vs. Embeddable


  • Subject: Re: Attachable vs. Embeddable
  • From: Bill Cheeseman <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 11:49:19 -0500

on 2/8/01 9:58 AM, Leonard Rosenthol at email@hidden wrote:

> Using the Finder and Folder Actions as the standard
> user example - we see that the Finder allows users to "attach"
> scripts to folder, YET there is no embedding taking place (thank
> G-d!).

Well, now, an alias to the script is in fact embedded in an invisible icon
file in the folder, every time a script is attached to a folder, so there is
a hook on which to hang the term "embedded," here.

Also, exactly 16,496,302,498 angels fit on the head of a pin, and I don't
want to hear any argument about it.

-
Bill Cheeseman, Quechee, Vermont <mailto:email@hidden>

The AppleScript Sourcebook
<http://www.AppleScriptSourcebook.com/>
Vermont Recipes-A Cocoa Cookbook
<http://www.stepwise.com/Articles/VermontRecipes/>


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Attachable vs. Embeddable
      • From: "Jeffrey L. McLean" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Attachable vs. Embeddable (From: Leonard Rosenthol <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Haunted script [was Re: Evaporating properties]
  • Next by Date: Re: How to "Tell" a varible name (solved??)
  • Previous by thread: Attachable vs. Embeddable
  • Next by thread: Re: Attachable vs. Embeddable
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread