Re: Admin: a suggestion on the script corruption problem.
Re: Admin: a suggestion on the script corruption problem.
- Subject: Re: Admin: a suggestion on the script corruption problem.
- From: Dale Saukerson <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:42:48 -0600
At 12:32 PM -0600 2/16/01, JollyRoger wrote:
Should we go the "readable post" route
Or should we go the "unreadable post" route
I vote for the readable solution. And I vote Chuq gets funds to hire
an assistant.
I want to follow the discussions by reading the sample code. I
believe you would better serve other newbies and inexperienced users
by allowing them to do the same. Suffering thru mangled text would
be much less of a burden than requiring us to use a tool to simply
follow the discussion. I would use the tool if made available, but
meanwhile if I can't demangle the code, I would ask the listmember to
send me the code via private E-mail.
We could alter our signatures to alert others to the fact that the
server mangles the code and suggest they request a sample by private
E-mail when they can't get the distributed code to work. Or how about
altering the listserver tag line to show the same thing?
Obviously, sample code is the *prime* function of this list. Lets
not all but remove easy access to it.
--
Dale Saukerson email@hidden
Minnesota, USA.
G4 Yikes PCI/400 mhz 256megs
AppleScript neophyte