• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Facespan 3.5.1: Is it good, or bad, for you?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Facespan 3.5.1: Is it good, or bad, for you?


  • Subject: Re: Facespan 3.5.1: Is it good, or bad, for you?
  • From: cris <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 00:28:40 +0100

on 20.02.2001 17:01 Uhr, Jolly Roger at email@hidden wrote:

> on 2/20/2001 8:35 AM, harry brindley (email@hidden) wrote:
>
>> Having said that, I still find it an essential tool in my box of
>> script things. Clients often judge a utility by how it "looks" to
>> them, not by how well it does the job. FaceSpan makes your scripts
>> look better.
>
> Better than Dialog Director?

It depends on what you want to do. The feature set of UI elements is much
better than DD's. In short, if you want to make something what looks like a
"real" app, use FS. If you only need some nice dialogs DD will be often
enough.



Greetings
cris :-)
--
English is my second language.
www.cooc.de


References: 
 >Re: Facespan 3.5.1: Is it good, or bad, for you? (From: Jolly Roger <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Facespan 3.5.1: Is it good, or bad, for you?
  • Next by Date: Re: Styles in AppleWorks??
  • Previous by thread: Re: Facespan 3.5.1: Is it good, or bad, for you?
  • Next by thread: Re: Facespan 3.5.1: Is it good, or bad, for you?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread