Re: Facespan 3.5.1: Is it good, or bad?
Re: Facespan 3.5.1: Is it good, or bad?
- Subject: Re: Facespan 3.5.1: Is it good, or bad?
- From: Emmanuel <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 15:51:21 -0500
At 7:23 -0500 21/02/01, Chris Banford wrote:
>
>From: David Lloyd <email@hidden>
>
>
>
> and Harry Brindley said:
>
>
>
>> It is much _easier_ to edit your client's GUI changes in FaceSpan.
>
>>If you can get it right first time, Dialog Director can look as good
>
>> but with much more effort. I generally want to spend my time
>
>>coding the guts of my scripts, not on making up its pretty face.
>
>
I'd rather see Script Debugger add the ability to create a U.I. (Script
>
Debugger Pro?). One tool.
You may know or not know that Smile (that we make and which is available
for free at <
http://www.tandb.com.au/smile/>) is a script editor with the
ability to create a U.I. Find there a link to a review on Bill Cheeseman's
site about this.
Emmanuel