Re: Those Darn Email Character Mappings
Re: Those Darn Email Character Mappings
- Subject: Re: Those Darn Email Character Mappings
- From: Nigel Garvey <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 03:39:46 +0000
Chuq Von Rospach wrote on Thu, 4 Jan 2001 13:33:18 -0800:
>
At 11:10 AM -0800 1/4/01, Paul Berkowitz wrote:
>
>That's definitely how it
>
>comes across, using a list server that insists on converting our characters
>
>to Windows-mapping. (I presume that's what it's doing, anyway. Is this
>
>wrong?)
>
>
yes, that's wrong.
As a matter of further interest, Chuq's reply is in digest number 191,
apparently mailed on 4th January at 15:26:57 PST. Richard's original post
is in digest number 189, timed a few minutes before at 15:03:32. Paul's
responses to BOTH posts is in digest number 190, timed at 14:11:24. I can
well believe that my ISP's mail server makes up its own dates for
messages, but the structural order of the digests is really strange.
NG