• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Reading Files bit by bit... help please.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Reading Files bit by bit... help please.


  • Subject: Re: Reading Files bit by bit... help please.
  • From: Johan Solve <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:48:08 +0100

How about Valentina? A powerful, scriptable and very fast relational database with low demands. 68020, 7.5+, 2 MB RAM, $50.

http://www.paradigmasoft.com/product/vapp.html

"Using the system level scripting technology of the MacOS, Apple Computer's AppleScript, you can easily build a custom solution to hook your critical, AppleScriptable applications to the fastest database solution on the MacOS. Hook your web server, spreadsheet, email software, accounting or any other scriptable application to Valentina and set your data free of built in storage and speed limitations.
Valentina allows users to create, modify, search, sort and work with multiple, open databases using Applescript, the system level scripting language of Apple Computer's Macintosh operating system. Database designers or anyone skilled at scripting can work with Valentina and any Applescript friendly interface builder, such as FaceSpan or IncWell's SuperCard product. "

Haven't considered that option. The closest I've come to using FileMaker is
ClarisWork databases. I've also toyed with MS Access a bit, but not much
further in the relational database arena. My AppleScript databases work
really well, because of the powerful property name/value pairing scheme,
but the only limitation is I must know the property label prior to reading
its value. How does FileMaker compare to this limitation. The second
advantage I have is creating records with unique fields, but FileMaker
records all share common fields, as I understand. It's just a matter of
creating different layouts. Correct me if I'm wrong. I will be looking into
using MacPerl as a solution to my problem here.

Ted

What about running Filemaker version 3 (under OS 7.6.1)? It is quite
powerful and only requires about 3 MB RAM minimum. Maybe useful on
those 68030 boxes...

Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 05:19:43 -0700
To: Applescript-Users <email@hidden>
From: email@hidden (Ted Wood)
Subject: Reading Files bit by bit... help please.

Hi Scripters,

I'm developing a large network and all CGI scripts and network
applications
are being developed using AppleScript. It makes extensive use of
databases,
but the network is being built using multiple low-end Macs (ie.
68030's,
etc), each with 8MB of RAM or more. Running FileMaker or a similar
large
database solution is not an option.
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list
email@hidden
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users

--
Johan Svlve
Web Application/FileMaker Developer
MONTANIA SOFTWARE & SOLUTIONS [FSA Member]
http://www.montania.se mailto:email@hidden
Halmstad Branch: Brogatan 16, SE-30243 Halmstad
phone +46 35-127205 fax +46 35-2802654 mobile +46 709-515570
Ronneby HQ: Soft Center , SE-37225 Ronneby
phone +46 457-386200 fax +46 457-26479


References: 
 >Re: Reading Files bit by bit... help please. (From: email@hidden (Ted Wood))

  • Prev by Date: Re: AS 1.5 (OS X PB) bug fixed in 1.5.5?
  • Next by Date: Re: StartupDisk application in Control panel
  • Previous by thread: Re: Reading Files bit by bit... help please.
  • Next by thread: Re: Reading Files bit by bit... help please.
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread