• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Scripting in OSX: Classic osaxen for Classic apps?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Scripting in OSX: Classic osaxen for Classic apps?


  • Subject: Re: Scripting in OSX: Classic osaxen for Classic apps?
  • From: JollyRoger <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 15:56:40 -0500

On 6/9/2001 10:43 AM, "Paul Berkowitz" <email@hidden> wrote:

> I sure hope that our valued osax developers are willing and able to
> carbonize their invaluable osaxen before too long.

Better than just carbonizing them, they should consider repackaging them as
carbonized scriptable applications. Unless your scripting addition syntax
would benefit users by being in the global namespace, there's little reason
not to package it as a scriptable application.

Speaking for myself, I'm porting most of my scripting additions to
carbonized scriptable applications (some faceless, some not).

JR


References: 
 >Re: Scripting in OSX: Classic osaxen for Classic apps? (From: Paul Berkowitz <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Newbie Question - Hidden Password
  • Next by Date: Dialog Director complexities [WAS: Re: Newbie Question - Hidden Password]
  • Previous by thread: Re: Scripting in OSX: Classic osaxen for Classic apps?
  • Next by thread: Re: Scripting in OSX: Classic osaxen for Classic apps? - SOLUTION
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread