Re: {aReal} as integer
Re: {aReal} as integer
- Subject: Re: {aReal} as integer
- From: Shane Stanley <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 21:53:30 +1000
On 20/6/01 8:35 PM +1000, Nigel Garvey, email@hidden, wrote:
>
This is quite surprising when you compare the methods visually
And if that's not enough, there's the version factor. A recent case was a
snippet of code Hans and I had both picked up from here, involving getting
properties and extracting individual properties from that, rather than
getting the individual properties separately.
At the time it was posted we both did tests that agreed, and started using
the method. But Hans tested it again recently while checking something else,
and the advantage had swung firmly the other way.
It's a hard life being a clock-watcher ;-)
--
Shane Stanley, email@hidden