Re: SoundJam had it first (was Re: iTunes coupe)
Re: SoundJam had it first (was Re: iTunes coupe)
- Subject: Re: SoundJam had it first (was Re: iTunes coupe)
- From: David Emmons <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 23:25:46 -0500
Let's also remember that Apple BOUGHT the rights to SoundJam from C&G...not
only the rights, but the design team <g> too. That is why iTunes and
SoundJam seem so much alike....but I gotta say I like iTunes better...it's
free. <G>
>
From: Timothy Bates <email@hidden>
>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 15:02:32 +1100
>
To: AppleScriptUsers List <email@hidden>
>
Subject: Re: SoundJam had it first (was Re: iTunes coupe)
>
>
On 6/11/01 12:28 AM, "JollyRoger" <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 11/5/2001 12:35 AM, "Timothy Bates" <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Don't you hate it when the internet DB info for a track is wrong ("crouded
>
>> house" instead of "crowded house"), or inconsistent ("Beatles, The" and
>
>> "The Beatles" and "Beatles" for the one band).
>
>> Now with iTunes 2.0.1, we have the solution!
>
> Don't you hate it when Mac users conveniently ignore third-party apps in
>
> favor of Apple apps just because Apple's name is on them? SoundJam has had
>
> this scriptability forever...
>
>
Correct in parts: People can only use what they know about. I never
>
purchased SoundJam (and probably never would have). Apple gives me iTunes
>
for free so I am happy.
>
>
But I don't "conveniently ignore third parties": I only ignore them when it
>
is convenient to do so: Often it is inconvenient to ignore third parties.
>
For instance, Apple's OS9 Text Edit application sucks. It is absolute junk.
>
But I love Tex-Edit and Pepper, and tell everyone I can about them. (Simple
>
Text under OSX has been _purposely_ crippled and I think that really sucks).
>
>
Similarly, Apple's Script Editor sucks, and I tell everyone to buy Script
>
Debugger.
>
>
Tcb
>
_______________________________________________
>
applescript-users mailing list
>
email@hidden
>
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users