• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: In fairness to FaceSpan
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: In fairness to FaceSpan


  • Subject: Re: In fairness to FaceSpan
  • From: Dave Fitch <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 20:48:42 +0100

Michael Scheurer <email@hidden> said:

<http://www.versiontracker.com/mp/new_search.m?productDB=mac&mode=Quick&OS_F
ilter=MacOS&search=facespan>

This entry is dated 21st of June 2001, that can hardly be called years.

And your point is what exactly?? A recent update doesn't mean that people didn't sit around for years waiting for *simple* *stupid* bugs to get fixed. There are simple scripts that FaceSpan couldn't compile even though there was nothing wrong with them because FaceSpan was *broken*.

People don't just bash the program for the hell of it you know...!
Dave
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Dave Fitch, email@hidden <http://www.dere-street.com/>
web design : stock photography : writing : research


References: 
 >Re: In fairness to FaceSpan (From: Michael Scheurer <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Applescript Studio Announced Today
  • Next by Date: Found count of on text item
  • Previous by thread: Re: In fairness to FaceSpan
  • Next by thread: Scipts and FM Pro
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread