• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: coercing a list
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: coercing a list


  • Subject: Re: coercing a list
  • From: Paul Berkowitz <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2001 11:00:05 -0700

On 9/2/01 9:25 AM, "has" <email@hidden> wrote:

> Well, I'm about as morally decayed as they come, so I've no qualms about
> using OSAX at every opportunity. But this thread got me thinking after a
> while, so I did some speed comparisons that seem to indicate that using
> TIDs to break down a string into a one-dimensional list is significantly
> faster than the jolly old "decompose x by y without sublists" I'm so used
> to using. Even decomposing TAB/CR-delimited text (which means using a loop
> to break down to sublists in the pure-AS method, so isn't as fast) seemed
> at best to be a draw.


I agree on the speed of TIDs. But one reason why Akua's commands are slower
is that Akua is not PPC native - it's still using the 680x0 mechanism. Greg
has said that he's working on a PPC native version, which now, I believe,
will also be carbonized for OS X (and will be shareware). I imagine that
trying to adapt 200+ commands for OS X is going to take him a while,
especially now that he apparently has a full-time job. It will be well worth
the wait.

--
Paul Berkowitz


References: 
 >Re: coercing a list (From: has <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Sort items in a list without OSAXen
  • Next by Date: Re: Sort items in a list without OSAXen
  • Previous by thread: Re: coercing a list
  • Next by thread: Re: coercing a list
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread