Re: Dylan (was What's the biggest barrier to wider AS adoption?)
Re: Dylan (was What's the biggest barrier to wider AS adoption?)
- Subject: Re: Dylan (was What's the biggest barrier to wider AS adoption?)
- From: Christopher Nebel <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 00:06:16 -0700
On Saturday, September 22, 2001, at 11:06 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2001 03:44:27 +0200 Helmut Fuchs <email@hidden> wrote:
P.S. Apple had a very beautiful programming language/environment
called "DyLan" in the works. It went the OpenDoc way. ...
I use to, till quite recently, visit what was left of the DyLan page
(taken over
by somebody who still wanted these overlooked technologies to be in
_some_ way
accessable) and was saddened to see what was obviously a perfectly good
project
abandoned.
Dylan [1] is still being supported, just not by Apple. Visit
<
http://www.gwydiondylan.org> or <
http://www.functionalobjects.com> and
see...
--Chris Nebel
AppleScript Engineering
[1] It's properly spelled with a lower-case "l", though it is short for
"dynamic language."