Re: Back to Adoption Barriers (was Re: Applescript Studio announced today!)
Re: Back to Adoption Barriers (was Re: Applescript Studio announced today!)
- Subject: Re: Back to Adoption Barriers (was Re: Applescript Studio announced today!)
- From: Helmut Fuchs <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 23:04:55 +0200
At 13:38 Uhr -0700 27.09.2001, Zavatone, Alex wrote:
I think you are implying short circuiting the expression right? Where in "x
and y or z", there is no reason to process the or if the and is already
proven false.
Or maybe my terminology is wrong.
Not really, as it's the one used in the ASLG ... [shuffling my feet,
while looking to the ground, being embarrassed].
With Alex's hint I was actually able to find the information for
items 1 and 2 of my last post within 21 seconds. And I was surprised
that I didn't find it when I looked for it the first time...
If anybody comes up with answers that quick for items 3 and 4 I will
have to go out for a pair of new glasses...
Actually I'm even more embarrassed now, as I broke my promise already.
Helmut