• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Applescript with Eudora
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Applescript with Eudora


  • Subject: Re: Applescript with Eudora
  • From: Bill Briggs <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 22:05:49 -0300

At 5:35 PM -0700 24/04/02, John W Baxter wrote:
Making requests is fine (several people making similar requests is fine).
The same person making the same request over and over ("hounding") is
likely to be counter productive.

I wasn't thinking of one person writing over and over again. Many people writing once might be useful. I've yet to do that, though I've compiled a list of requests for when I do send that letter.



>>Apple doesn't consider it their job to document all the
capabilities of AppleScript-capable applications.

Apple can't. It doesn't know the implementation. It doesn't know when the implementation has changed (cf BBEdit recently; Stuffit Deluxe before that).

Apple could more strongly encourage developers to document the
implementation. And part of that would be doing so themselves, at which
they have a mixed record (FileMaker does very well, Mail.app not, etc.)

Unless Apple changes the nature of the 'aete' data, the Dictionary can't be the only documentation for any but simple cases. And it wasn't intended to be (it was originally intended to be in part a discovery mechanism for other applications). And such a change would produce at least 5 (more likely 10) years of confusion with the old and the new side by side.

Well, I didn't write the bit you're responding too, but I agree that the developers should document their own implementation and include copious examples in the text or in the form of sample scripts, or both. For their part, Apple should certainly encourage it, and it would be nice if they promoted a more uniform approach to scripting implementations as they did for the Mac's UI. Some of my favourite applications have behaviours that are not typical of AppleScript and it didn't need to be that way.

- web
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >Applescript with Eudora (From: David Crowe <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Applescript with Eudora (From: Bill Briggs <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Applescript with Eudora (From: John W Baxter <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Reco Label Stringer
  • Next by Date: list to records
  • Previous by thread: Re: Applescript with Eudora
  • Next by thread: Re: Applescript with Eudora
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread