• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: APPLE PREVIEWS NEW APPLESCRIPT TECHNOLOGY
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: APPLE PREVIEWS NEW APPLESCRIPT TECHNOLOGY


  • Subject: Re: APPLE PREVIEWS NEW APPLESCRIPT TECHNOLOGY
  • From: Christian Boyce <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 00:57:38 -0800

Subject: Re: APPLE PREVIEWS NEW APPLESCRIPT TECHNOLOGY
From: Bill Cheeseman <email@hidden>
To: AppleScript-Users Mail <email@hidden>

on 02-12-22 2:08 AM, Christian Boyce at email@hidden wrote:

the hammer is pretty far away from "Check
Syntax" in my mind.

The hammer has been used as a button for compiling code in Project Builder
for a long time. You get used to it pretty quickly. A hammer is a tool you
use for building things, so the metaphor is very direct.

Having never used Project Builder (actually, having never HEARD of Project Builder), the hammer icon as a symbol for compiling code is brand new to me. I may be the minority but my Mac programming experience is limited to AppleScript and OneClick. So, no "hammer=compile code" background here.

There are so many tools that can be used to build things that I think that the choice of a hammer (remembering my lack of familiarity with Project Builder) is somewhat arbitrary.

What's wrong in Script Editor is to call what it does "check syntax." That's
the term that has been used in Script Editor forever, but the command does
more than just check the syntax -- it also compiles the script into an
executable form. I think the original idea behind the term "check syntax"
was to avoid implying that you're "programming," but I always thought it was
misleading. If you think of the command as "build" instead of "check
syntax," the hammer makes perfect sense.

I guess you would have to call this a "desktop mixed metaphor."

I think you're right! Maybe we need two buttons-- one that is "check syntax" (sort of like a spelling check in a word processor) and another that does the compiling. At least that would separate the two functions in the user's mind.

I do think it would be important to choose icons that make sense to all manner of AppleScript users-- the pros, the beginners, and the in-betweeners.

Regardless of the icons I'm happy to see this 2.0 version of Script Editor. Now, if we could only record the Finder...
--
Christian Boyce
http://www.christianboyce.com
310-452-3720
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: APPLE PREVIEWS NEW APPLESCRIPT TECHNOLOGY
      • From: Tim Bumgarner <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: APPLE PREVIEWS NEW APPLESCRIPT TECHNOLOGY
  • Next by Date: Re: Raw codes for Network Setup Scripting calls
  • Previous by thread: Re: APPLE PREVIEWS NEW APPLESCRIPT TECHNOLOGY
  • Next by thread: Re: APPLE PREVIEWS NEW APPLESCRIPT TECHNOLOGY
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread