• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology conflicts (i.e. the osax namespace problem)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology conflicts (i.e. the osax namespace problem)


  • Subject: Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology conflicts (i.e. the osax namespace problem)
  • From: JollyRoger <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 07:11:37 -0600

On 1/21/2002 4:36 AM, "Simon Forster" <email@hidden> wrote:

> Death to scripting additions! Long live faceless background applications!

Word. The only pro-scripting-addition argument I have heard to the contrary
that *might* hold water is that calling scripting additions doesn't cause an
application to launch, and is therefore faster. But the benefits far
outweigh that side-effect, if you ask me.

JR


References: 
 >Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology confilicts (i.e. the osax namespace problem) (From: Simon Forster <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: [OS X] Scripting Internet Connect
  • Next by Date: Re: preferred memory size
  • Previous by thread: Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology confilicts (i.e. the osax namespace problem)
  • Next by thread: Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology conflicts (i.e. the osax namespace problem)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread