• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology confilicts
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology confilicts


  • Subject: Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology confilicts
  • From: Shane Stanley <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 08:28:27 +1100

On 27/1/02 8:05 AM +1000, Jon Pugh, email@hidden, wrote:

> The real question is, are the occasional terminology conflicts worth all this
> bother?

That was my first reaction when this thread appeared. After all, when was
the last terminology conflict reported here, for example? And OS X has, at
least, temporarily, provided a more drastic fix in the form of very few
additions.

But then I look at some of these new apps coming from the other side of the
fence, with dictionaries that suggest the authors have only a tenuous grip
on how AS works, and I wonder whether the problem is going to come back and
bite us all later.

OTOH, like you I find the proposed solutions "too complicated". And I guess
the newcomers can be beaten into submission along the way, just like in the
past.

> I don't think I'll bother, for example.

I'm taking this as official confirmation that a port _is_ coming at some
stage ;-)

--
Shane Stanley, email@hidden


References: 
 >Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology confilicts (From: Jon Pugh <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Apple Software Restore running in OS X?
  • Next by Date: Re: Script hotsync??
  • Previous by thread: Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology confilicts
  • Next by thread: Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology confilicts
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread