Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology confilicts
Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology confilicts
- Subject: Re: solutions to scripting addition terminology confilicts
- From: Shane Stanley <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 08:28:27 +1100
On 27/1/02 8:05 AM +1000, Jon Pugh, email@hidden, wrote:
>
The real question is, are the occasional terminology conflicts worth all this
>
bother?
That was my first reaction when this thread appeared. After all, when was
the last terminology conflict reported here, for example? And OS X has, at
least, temporarily, provided a more drastic fix in the form of very few
additions.
But then I look at some of these new apps coming from the other side of the
fence, with dictionaries that suggest the authors have only a tenuous grip
on how AS works, and I wonder whether the problem is going to come back and
bite us all later.
OTOH, like you I find the proposed solutions "too complicated". And I guess
the newcomers can be beaten into submission along the way, just like in the
past.
>
I don't think I'll bother, for example.
I'm taking this as official confirmation that a port _is_ coming at some
stage ;-)
--
Shane Stanley, email@hidden