Re: Passing *possible* variables to a handler
Re: Passing *possible* variables to a handler
- Subject: Re: Passing *possible* variables to a handler
- From: Paul Berkowitz <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 14:44:03 -0700
On 7/18/02 2:30 PM, "Arthur J. Knapp" <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 7/18/02 12:16 PM, "Arthur J. Knapp" <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>
>
>> First of all, there is the Serge effect, where a script object might be
>
>> needed by a handler for only the life of the handler for speeding up access
>
>> to list items. Rather than referencing the object directly, one can use
>
>> "Nigel" access, giving the script object methods that provide faster access:
>
>
Whoops, I can see how I was very unclear here...
>
>
> Are you saying that this "Nigel" method provides even faster access than the
>
> straight "Serge" method? by much? Or is it just an alternate way to get this
>
> same fast access?
>
>
NO, NO, NO... ;-)
>
>
We've had this conversation before. Both "Serge" and "Nigel" list-item
>
access are "equally" faster than simply getting a normal list's item:
Right. That's what I thought. Your previous comments _were_ unclear. Just
checking.
--
Paul Berkowitz
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.