Re: 1 to 001 & the duplicate command
Re: 1 to 001 & the duplicate command
- Subject: Re: 1 to 001 & the duplicate command
- From: Stephen Swift <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2002 11:44:20 -0400
At 5/31/02 3:36 AM, Nigel Garvey (email@hidden) Wrote:
>
There is indeed a bug in 8.6 (fixed in later versions) where 'duplicate'
>
returns the original item instead of the duplicate. You have to set up your
>
own reference to the duplicate, using the expected name and the folder to
>
which you've duplicated the item. I'm away from my 8.6 machine at the moment,
>
so I can't check what the implications are for the duplicate's name if another
>
duplication has already occurred.
Okay, until I upgrade I'll just have to think of a workaround. Would
referring to files by their ID's work?
Stephen Swift
email@hidden
-----------------------------------------------
AppleScript Guru - The Mac Observer
http://www.macobserver.com/tips/applescript
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.