• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: handler failure [oops! correction]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: handler failure [oops! correction]


  • Subject: Re: handler failure [oops! correction]
  • From: Paul Skinner <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 22:41:34 -0500

On Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 02:40 PM, has wrote:

Paul Skinner wrote:

set b's bar to a's foo
b's bar
--> <<handler foo>> --!!!!!
[...]
It looks to me like you meant to ...

Awww, shit.

Sorry, but I screwed up that sample code completely. (A typo, made in haste
when retyping from memory after bloody Eudora ate my original post.)

Here's a fixed version. (I've also taken the liberty of adjusting the code,
to make it a little easier for you to see what's going wrong.)

======================================================================

script a
property _val : 1

on foo()
return _val
end foo
end script

script b
property _thing : "hello"

property bar : missing value
end script

a's foo()
--> 1

set b's bar to a's foo
b's bar()
--> "hello" --!!!!!

======================================================================

As you can see, the result is completely crack-addled. (I know what's going
wrong here, but let's see who else can figure it out.)

has (class idiot since 1971)

--
http://www.barple.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk -- The Little Page of AppleScripts

That is better. But the problem is the same. Your foo handler needs a value it can't get. Yes, AppleScript gives it something different without complaining ( the property whose index matches) and that is a bug.

script a
property _val : 1

on foo()
return _val of a
end foo
end script

script b
property _thing : "hello"

property bar : missing value
end script

a's foo()
--> 1

set b's bar to a's foo
b's bar()
-->1

In my opinion this is not a good idea. The foo handler requires an external property to function properly. Personally, I think that handlers that contain external resources like the one above should be passed around in a script object.
It makes me wonder what kind of clever trick you were pursuing when you first did this. Dynamically modifiable handlers? Self replicating, artificially intelligent handlers? Cold fusion? : )
--
Paul Skinner
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
References: 
 >Re: handler failure [oops! correction] (From: has <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Explain "Finder-Independent" file management....?
  • Next by Date: Re: Entourage: Kill that Daemon!
  • Previous by thread: Re: handler failure [oops! correction]
  • Next by thread: Re: handler failure [oops! correction]
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread