Re: Thanks
Re: Thanks
- Subject: Re: Thanks
- From: kai <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 14:13:43 +0100
on Sat, 02 Aug 2003 11:40:11 +0200, Paul Moortgat <email@hidden>
wrote:
>
I admit, I created a little disturbance to force some reaction. Which I
>
got and also 3 working solutions. I wasn't meant to kick peoples
>
ankles, just a little stir to get an answer.
(For anyone who may have missed it, Paul's message read: "Thanks everyone
for the zero answers I got.")
While the approach may appear to have worked this time, Paul, I wouldn't
rely on it too much in the future. (I was already working on a response to
your original message when I saw your comment - and nearly pulled my
suggestion as a result.)
This recent message also managed to stir a response - but without the
adverse reaction:
-----------------------------------
Subject: Mail question, another way
-----------------------------------
on Thu, 31 Jul 2003 21:02:13 -0700, Christian Boyce wrote:
>
Judging by the responses I got (or didn't) I must have phrased my
>
question about scripting Apple's Mail program rather poorly. I'm going
>
to try again.
-----------------------------------
>
Thanks to all who helped me. Even the ones who pointed me to the wrong
>
attitude.
I think they were trying to point you to the right attitude. ;-) However,
it's good to hear that some replies have helped to resolve your scripting
problem.
Best wishes.
---
kai
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.