Re: [OT] Verification required?
Re: [OT] Verification required?
- Subject: Re: [OT] Verification required?
- From: "John C. Welch" <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 16:58:34 -0600
On 12/28/03 4:13 PM, "Christian Jon Anderson" <email@hidden> wrote:
>
I am open to any suggestions on how others handle junk mail. I have an
>
extensive rules list in Entourage X, have tried JunkBroom, SpamSieve and a
>
couple of others, and am trying 0spam to see if I can shave some time off of
>
what I am spending on dealing with spam.
In the end, ALL active anti-spam will be defeated. Why? Because spammers can
buy JunkBroom, SpamSieve, etc., and beat on them until they find the holes.
It's unavoidable.
The only method I've found that works is to filter out all the stuff I DO
want to folders. That way, the only thing left in my inbox is 99% spam.
Makes dealing with it MUCH simpler. The advantage of this is that since I'm
not actually filtering spam, the spammers can't defeat it.
It's sort of a white-list, passive antispam system, but it works really
well.
john
--
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand
ready to do violence on their behalf."
- George Orwell
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.