• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: osascript(1)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: osascript(1)


  • Subject: Re: osascript(1)
  • From: Michael Kelly <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 00:30:43 -0800
  • Mail-followup-to: AppleScript-Users <email@hidden>

On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 08:45:38AM -0800, Philip Aker wrote:
> I can't check on 10.1.5 at the moment but your script certainly works
> in 10.2.3 if I save the file as a text file. Script Editor wants to
> give it the extension ".applescript" but it still works if the
> extension is removed. If your text is compiled as an OS X script file
> in 10.2.3 it works much faster. Maybe your problem has something to do
> with whether or not the script has been stored in the resource fork or
> the data fork or that osascript was improved in Jaguar.

I haven't messed around with the various methods of saving scripts
(compiled, plain-text, etc), but I'll bet it's an improvement in Jaguar.
(One more reason to give in and present Apple with my offering of $130,
I suppose.)

Thanks!
--
Michael
email@hidden
http://www.jedimike.net/
_______________________________________________
applescript-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/applescript-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >Re: osascript(1) (From: Philip Aker <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Name of current users home folder (OS X)
  • Next by Date: RE: Why are compiled scripts slower than from Script Editor?
  • Previous by thread: Re: osascript(1)
  • Next by thread: [ANN] PreFab UI Browser 1.0
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread